
![]() Click HERE to visit the blog Amanda's posted since December 2006, where she and guests write on issues of personal, local, regional, and national interest SearchNavigation |
Tenants' Rights
Submitted by Amanda on Mon, 03/10/2008 - 9:37am.
The Portland Mercury's question for candidates, a couple of weeks ago: "It seems that due to the current mortgage meltdown and the recession we are currently in, all of the major property management companies have decided to raise their rates in some cases up to 25 percent in non-hip areas. Most of the statutes of Tenant’s rights are geared towards property owners, not renters. Leases are not worth the paper they are printed on: I have known many people who are given the 72 hours to vacate notice letter for the most shallow of reasons, but God forbid the tenant wants to walk away as management companies have no problem sticking the ex-renter with charges that are legal, but in bad faith. i.e., you have lived somewhere for 5 years without any work being done on the property, yet the ex-tenant will be billed accordingly for the work that is needed, even though the “damages” are just a part of normal wear and tear. Is there anything the candidates are thinking of that can help tenants avoid astronomical rent hikes and find more ways to balance out the power of property owners? I am not talking about low-income housing either (which i feel is a separate issue), but working-class citizens that are not seeing their wages get any higher suddenly getting sticker shock when their rent agreements are up for renewal. In all honesty, due to my last rent hike, I am not supporting any property-tax levy because I know this will give my management company the power to disproportionately increase my rent again beyond the true cost of the tax so they can pocket more money. People are squeezed as much as they can be and this would be will just lower the standard of living to a high degree. I love this town, but it seems that the citizens who are not broke, nor own homes do not really have anyone looking out for them. I wish to remain anonymous because I am afraid of retaliation." My response: Tenants have rights, and it is the City of Portland's duty to do more to protect renters, inform them of their rights, and preserve/provide affordable rental housing. Renters are often treated like second class citizens. The person asking this question feared to give their name due to concern about retaliation, and theirs is but one example of the challenges renters face. I hope Blogtown readers who rent will offer your own experiences in the comments, as I know the questioner is not alone. Recently, the Oregonian changed the header of its Sunday section advertising housing to "Homes and Rentals", as if people who rent do not live in a home. I lived in a Salvation Army shelter when I first immigrated, then in rental housing for seven years. The shelter wasn't home to me, but the apartments were. My neighborhood's homes are half rentals, half owner-occupied. I will work to improve housing affordability and quality for both buyers and renters. If I am elected to the Portland City Council, I will:
Legal remedies for tenant problems should be the last resort. Renters don't have time or money to sue after unfair eviction or spurious maintenance charges, and few retaliation charges are upheld in court given landlords' right to give 30-day no-cause eviction notices. Regulations and routine inspections should be in place so that clean, safe rental homes are provided without tenant complaints. These aren't academic rules and policy changes. These decisions and strategies directly affect people's security and quality of life here in Portland. In a healthy city, residents need affordable and safe homes, whether they own or rent. I care about renters, homeowners, and people experiencing homelessness. If you vote to elect me as your next City Commissioner, I will work to ensure that all Portlanders have safe, pleasant homes, in 95 safe, pleasant neighborhoods. »
|